4.7 Article

Highlights in TMPRSS2 inhibition mechanism with guanidine derivatives approved drugs for COVID-19 treatment

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/07391102.2023.2169762

关键词

TMPRSS2; blind docking; repurposed drugs; ADMET; MD simulation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2) plays a critical role in the entry of coronaviruses into human cells. Famotidine, Argatroban, Guanadrel, and Guanethidine have strong binding affinities to TMPRSS2 and may act as potential anti-SARS-CoV-2 therapeutics. The protein-ligand complexes exhibit various non-covalent interactions and show good stability. MD simulation and binding free energy calculations suggest Argatroban and Famotidine as promising scaffolds for TMPRSS2 inhibition.
Transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2) has been identified as a critical key for the entry of coronaviruses into human cells by cleaving and activating the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2. To block the TMPRSS2 function, 18 approved drugs, containing the guanidine group were tested against TMPRSS2's ectodomain (7MEQ). Among these drugs, Famotidine, Argatroban, Guanadrel and Guanethidine strongly binds with TMPRSS2 S1 pocket with estimated Fullfitness energies of -1847.12, -1630.87, -1605.81 and -1600.52 kcal/mol, respectively. A significant number of non-covalent interactions such as hydrogen bonding, hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions were detected in protein-ligand complexes. In addition, the ADMET analysis revealed a perfect concurrence with the aptitude of these drugs to be developed as an anti-SARS-CoV-2 therapeutics. Further, MD simulation and binding free energy calculations were performed to evaluate the dynamic behavior and stability of protein-ligand complexes. The results obtained herein highlight the enhanced stability and good binding affinities of the Argatroban and Famotidine towards the target protein, hence might act as new scaffolds for TMPRSS2 inhibition. Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据