4.4 Article

Homogeneous Pt nanostructures surface functionalized with phenylboronic acid phosphonic acid derivatives as potential biochemical nanosensors and drugs: SERS and TERS studies

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.35225

关键词

phenylboronic acid phosphonic acid (PBA-PA); platinum nanoparticles (PtNPs); surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS); tip-enhanced Raman scattering (TERS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) and tip-enhanced Raman scattering (TERS) were used to investigate the selective adsorption of N-substituted 4-[(NH-R)(phosphono)-S-methyl]phenylboronic acids on platinum nanoparticles (PtNPs) surfaces from aqueous and air environments. The interaction between the studied compounds and PtNPs/H2O and PtNPs/air interfaces was analyzed and compared. PtNPs with a size of approximately 12 nm were synthesized via a surfactant/ion-free method, and their characteristics were determined using UV-Vis spectroscopy, dynamic light scattering (DLS), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and X-ray powder diffraction (XRD).
Here, surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) and tip-enhanced Raman scattering (TERS) were used to characterize the selective adsorption of N-substituted 4-[(NH-R)(phosphono)-S-methyl]phenylboronic acids on the surface of platinum nanoparticles (PtNPs) from an aqueous solution and from air. The nature of the interaction of the studied compounds with the PtNPs/H2O and PtNPs/air interfaces was discussed and compared. For this purpose, 4-[(N-anilino)(phosphono)-S-methyl]phenylboronic acid (1-PBA-PA) and its two analogs (2-PBA-PA and bis{1-PBA-PA}) as well as the PtNPs were synthesized in surfactant/ion-free solution via a synthetic route that allows control of the size and morphology of the NPs. The positively charged PtNPs with a size of similar to 12 nm were characterized by ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy (UV-Vis), dynamic light scattering (DLS), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and X-ray powder diffraction (XRD).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据