Estimating lumbar spine loading when using back-support exoskeletons in lifting tasks

Low-back pain (LBP) continues as the leading cause of work-related musculoskeletal disorders, and the high LBP burden is attributed largely to physical risk factors prevalent in manual material handling tasks. Industrial back -support exoskeletons (BSEs) are a promising ergonomic intervention to help control/prevent exposures to such risk factors. While earlier research has demonstrated beneficial effects of BSEs in terms of reductions in super-ficial back muscle activity, limited evidence is available regarding the impacts of these devices on spine loads. We evaluated the effects of two passive BSEs (BackXTM AC and LaevoTM V2.5) on lumbosacral compression and shear forces during repetitive lifting using an optimization-based model. Eighteen participants (gender-balanced) completed four minutes of repetitive lifting in nine different conditions, involving symmetric and asymmetric postures when using the BSEs (along with no BSE as a control condition). Using both BSEs reduced estimated peak compression and anteroposterior shear forces (by-8-15%). Such reductions, however, were task-specific and depended on the BSE design. LaevoTM use reduced mediolateral shear forces during asymmetric lifting (by-35%). We also found that reductions in composite measures of trunk muscle activity may not correspond well with changes in spine forces when using a BSE. These results can help guide the proper selection and application of BSEs during repetitive lifting tasks. Future work is recommended to explore the viability of different biomechanical models to assess changes in spine mechanical loads when using BSEs and whether reasonable estimates would be obtained using such models.

Automated summary

Low-back pain is a major cause of work-related musculoskeletal disorders attributed to physical risk factors. Industrial back-support exoskeletons (BSEs) have shown potential in reducing spine loads during repetitive lifting tasks. This study evaluated the effects of two passive BSEs on lumbosacral compression and shear forces. Results showed that both BSEs reduced peak compression and shear forces, but the reduction was task-specific and dependent on BSE design. Future research is recommended to explore different biomechanical models for assessing spine mechanical loads when using BSEs.