4.6 Article

An evolutionary molecular adaptation of an unusual stefin from the liver fluke Fasciola hepatica redefines the cystatin superfamily

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 299, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbc.2023.102970

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fasciolosis is a parasitic disease caused by the liver fluke Fasciola hepatica and has become an emerging human disease. The protein FhCyLS-2 from F. hepatica is a member of the cystatin superfamily and has characteristics of both intracellular stefins and secreted true cystatins. It acts as a broad specificity inhibitor of cysteine cathepsins, playing a dual role in the regulation of exogenous and endogenous proteolysis.
Fasciolosis is a worldwide parasitic disease of ruminants and an emerging human disease caused by the liver fluke Fasciola hepatica. The cystatin superfamily of cysteine protease in-hibitors is composed of distinct families of intracellular stefins and secreted true cystatins. FhCyLS-2 from F. hepatica is an unusual member of the superfamily, where our sequence and 3D structure analyses in this study revealed that it combines characteristics of both families. The protein architecture demonstrates its relationship to stefins, but FhCyLS-2 also contains the secretion signal peptide and disulfide bridges typical of true cystatins. The secretion status was confirmed by detecting the presence of FhCyLS-2 in excretory/secretory products, supported by immunolocalization. Our high -resolution crystal structure of FhCyLS-2 showed a distinct di-sulfide bridging pattern and functional reactive center. We determined that FhCyLS-2 is a broad specificity inhibitor of cysteine cathepsins from both the host and F. hepatica, sug-gesting a dual role in the regulation of exogenous and endog-enous proteolysis. Based on phylogenetic analysis that identified several FhCyLS-2 homologues in liver/intestinal foodborne flukes, we propose a new group within the cystatin superfamily called cystatin-like stefins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据