4.6 Article

Enhanced tensile properties of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene fibers by solubility improvement with mixed solvents

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 140, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.53715

关键词

disentanglement; mixed solvents; molecular weight retention; pre-swelling; tensile properties; ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene fibers

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the tensile properties of uUltra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) fibers by using mixed solvents with improved solubility. By introducing olive oil (OO) as a poor solvent for pre-swelling UHMWPE in decalin, UHMWPE fibers with high molecular weight and low entanglement are prepared using paraffin oil as spinning solvent. The addition of 20 wt% OO results in significant molecular chain disentanglement, higher molecular weight retention, and improved tensile strength and modulus of the obtained UHMWPE fibers.
The tensile properties of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) fibers obtained from mixed solvents are addressed by virtue of improved solubility. In this work, olive oil (OO) was introduced as a poor solvent for the pre-swelling of UHMWPE in decalin, and its mass percentage was intended to be 10, 20, 30, and 40 wt% of UHMWPE. Then UHMWPE fibers with high molecular weight retention and low entanglement were prepared with paraffin oil as spinning solvent by gel-spinning and hot-drawing. Unlike other samples, there is a more significant molecular chain disentanglement and higher molecular weight retention for UHMWPE fibers as OO addition is 20 wt%. Surprisingly, obtained UHMWPE fibers exhibit tensile strength up to 33.85 cN/dtex and tensile modulus of 1673.27 cN/dtex, with an increase of 24.0% and 32.3%, respectively, compared with that of UHMWPE fibers without decalin/OO pre-swelling. Furthermore, the obtained UHMWPE fibers are accompanied by a marked improvement in melting temperature, crystallization and orientation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据