4.6 Article

Pd/C embedded crosslinked polystyrene fibers as an efficient catalyst for Heck reactions

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 140, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.53363

关键词

electrospinning; fiber; heck reaction; Pd; C; polystyrene

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pd/C embedded polystyrene fibers were prepared using electrospinning and cross-linking techniques. The resulting fibers showed improved solvent resistance and catalytic performance in Heck reactions. The fibrous catalyst also exhibited enhanced separation and recycling properties compared to particulate catalysts.
Pd/C embedded polystyrene fibers were successfully prepared by electrospinning. The polystyrene molecules were then cross-linked by paraformaldehyde in sulfuric acid to improve the solvent resistance of composite fibers. SEM images conformed the preparation of uniform and smooth composite fibers. FT-IR spectra demonstrated that the polystyrene molecules inside fibers have been sulphonated and crosslinked. Heck reactions were used to evaluate the catalytic performance of these novel composite fibers. The catalysis results show that this composite fiber mat catalyzed Heck reactions could be evidently promoted by using preferred reducing alcohol agent and solvent. Under the optimized reaction conditions, this composite fiber mat could effectively catalyze the Heck reactions of aromatic iodides with n-butyl acrylate to afford the products with satisfied yields. Especially, compared with the particulate Pd/C catalyst, the separation and recycling of this fibrous catalyst from the reaction mixture were significantly improved due to the larger fibrous structure. At last, this fiber catalyst was successfully reused for eight times with little loss of initial catalytic activity, which was even better than the pristine Pd/C catalyst. Hence, embedment of particulate supported metal catalysts inside the crosslinked polystyrene fibers can effectively improve their catalytic performance and handiness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据