4.7 Article

Dynamic implantation - an improved approach for a large area SIMS measurement

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY
卷 38, 期 2, 页码 267-275

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2ja00190j

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) is used to study the chemical/elemental composition of samples by bombarding the surface with energetic primary ions and analyzing the secondary ions that escape. To ensure a clean surface and improve the yield of secondary ions, a larger region than the measurement area is pre-sputtered until a steady state is reached. We have developed a method called dynamic implantation, which allows for uniform pre-implantation of large regions of interest without causing overlapping shadows or sample deformation.
Secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) is applied to investigate chemical/elemental composition of samples revealed by the secondary ions escaping the surface while bombarding it with energetic primary ions. Usually, a region larger than the measurement is pre-sputtered to clean the surface, while reactive primary ions enhancing the secondary ion yield get implanted until a steady-state/equilibrium is reached. To avoid undesirable shadows and sample deformation at overlapping regions caused by multiple pre-sputtering/implantation we have developed an improved approach to pre-implant large field of interest homogeneously. This is done as a single action before starting the measurements. We have named it dynamic implantation. We present here two approaches for dynamic implantation: line implantation for measuring long transects and area implantation for large area mosaics. The homogeneously implanted region allows for analysis of a big field without generating artefacts. Broadly applicable preliminary calculations and guided step-by-step procedures are presented using the NanoSIMS Cameca Software as a model. Advantages and disadvantages of our method, and further recommendations for its application are highlighted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据