4.7 Article

Construction of Co3O4/CeO2 heterostructure nanoflowers facilitates deployment of oxygen defects to enhance the oxygen evolution kinetics

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 933, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.167700

关键词

Heterostructure nanoflowers; Electronic behavior; Interfaces; Oxygen defects; Oxygen evolution reaction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The bottom-up design strategy and heterostructures can optimize the materials properties for better oxygen evolution reaction (OER) performance. The creation of abundant phase interfaces and the assembly of nanograins into a three-dimensional hierarchical pore structure can increase the number of active sites, enhance the electronic conductivity, and provide effective sites and channels for mass transport. The construction of Co3O4/CeO2 heterostructure nanoflowers contributes to the excellent OER performance of the catalyst.
The bottom-up design strategy can more rationally optimize the composition and structure of the materials to impart excellent oxygen evolution reaction (OER) performance. Heterostructures can modulate electronic behavior through interface construction to optimize materials properties for superior OER performance. In this paper, we created abundant Co3O4/CeO2 phase interfaces to tune the grain size, the electronic con-figuration of cobalt sites, and the content of oxygen defects in Co3O4, which increases the number of active sites, enhances the electronic conductivity of the material, and optimized the adsorption energy for reaction intermediates. Moreover, the assembly of nanograins into nanoflowers with a three-dimensional hier-archical pore structure can provide more effective active sites, abundant pores and channels for mass transport, and discrete cavities for in-depth reactions of intermediates. The construction of Co3O4/CeO2 heterostructure nanoflowers (CoCe HNFs) contributes to the excellent OER performance of the catalyst. (c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据