4.7 Article

Characterization of Key Odorants in Chardonnay Seeds

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 70, 期 51, 页码 16316-16322

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.2c06119

关键词

Chardonnay marc; Chardonnay seeds; solvent-assisted flavor evaporation; aroma extract dilution analysis; stable isotope diluting assay

资金

  1. Sonomaceuticals, LLC (Sonoma, CA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the aroma profile of Chardonnay seeds was analyzed, and 6 key odorants were identified. These findings provide a foundation for optimizing the flavor of Chardonnay marc powder in the future.
Chardonnay marc, a co-product of the winemaking industry, is a combination of skins, seeds, and stems remaining after the juice is pressed from the grapes. This co-product amounts to over half a million tons per year. Recently, Chardonnay marc has been emerging as a healthy and flavorful food ingredient. The aroma contribution of the seeds to the overall aroma of Chardonnay marc remains unknown. In the present study, 43 odorants were identified in Chardonnay seeds employing aroma extract dilution analysis (AEDA) performed on a distillate prepared by solvent extraction and solvent-assisted flavor evaporation (SAFE) distillation. Of those, 6 odorants with a flavor dilution (FD) factor >= 64 were quantitated using stable isotope dilution assays (SIDAs). The odorants included (2E,4E)-deca-2,4-dienal (fatty, OAV 8028), 3-methylnonane-2,4-dione (hay, OAV 4772), (2E,4E)-nona-2,4-dienal (fatty, OAV 1750), hexanal (green, OAV 1481), linalool (floral, citrus, OAV 28), and 2-phenylethanol (floral, rose, OAV 2). An aroma simulation model was prepared based on the quantitative data, and its aroma was a close match to the Chardonnay seed powder. Omission studies applied to the aroma simulation model showed that hexanal and 3-methylnonane-2,4-dione were the key odorants driving the aroma profile. This research established a foundation for future studies aimed at optimizing the flavor of Chardonnay marc powder.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据