4.6 Article

Effective Methodology for Selective Recovery of Lithium Values from Discarded Li-Ion Batteries

期刊

JOM
卷 75, 期 4, 页码 1119-1127

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11837-022-05684-4

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study presents an effective methodology for selectively recovering lithium (Li) from different types of discarded Li-ion batteries. By thermally reducing the complex stoichiometry of the cathode composition at 850 degrees C with 10% carbon addition, more than 99% of Li can be dissolved using sodium persulfate (Na2S2O8) as an oxidant. The dissolved Li can be recovered as lithium carbonate (Li2CO3) with a purity of over 99% through precipitation and can be used for battery cathode composition and other applications.
The study discloses an effective methodology for selective recovery of lithium (Li) content from the cathode material of assorted types of discarded Li-ion batteries. The complex stoichiometry of cathode composition of batteries was found to be thermally reduced at an optimum temperature of 850 degrees C with 10% addition of carbon. The Li content was selectively dissolved in aqueous media using sodium persulfate (Na2S2O8) as an oxidant. The effect of varying time, temperature, and molar concentration of Na2S2O8 for Li dissolution/leaching was systematically studied. It was observed that more than 99% Li can selectively be dissolved in 0.2 M Na2S2O8 at an optimum temperature of 80 degrees C and in 4 h time from reduced cathode material, whereas only similar to 32% Li extraction was achieved for as-received cathode materials using the same optimum parameters. Finally, lithium carbonate (Li2CO3) was recovered through precipitation by adjusting the pH value of the lixiviant using sodium carbonate. The recovered Li2CO3 powder was found to have a purity of more than 99% and can be used as a precursor for battery cathode composition and other potential applications with a view to improving resource efficiency and the circular economy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据