4.4 Article

Relationships between saturated paste and 1:1 or 1:5 soil/water extract sodium adsorption ratios

期刊

IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE
卷 72, 期 2, 页码 503-514

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ird.2775

关键词

electrical conductivity; SAR; soil salinity; soil sodicity; Resume

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the relationship between different methods of soil extraction and the measurement of sodium adsorption ratio. The results show a strong linear relationship between the methods, with the 1:1 method showing the highest coefficient of determination. The study also highlights the influence of soil properties on the relationship.
This study investigates the relationship between the sodium adsorption ratio acquired by the saturated paste extract (SAR(e)) method and those acquired by 1:1 and 1:5 soil/water extracts (SAR(1:1) and SAR(1:5)) by using 122 surface soil samples from 5 agricultural areas of Greece. The soil samples are classified as medium to fine textured with negligible gypsum content and low organic carbon content. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) method was used to obtain all extracts. The results showed that the relationships between SAR(e) and SAR(1:1), as well as SAR(e) and SAR(1:5), are strongly linear, with a higher coefficient of determination (R-2) observed in the case of the SAR(e)-SAR(1:1) relationship. The linear regression equations were SAR(e) = 1.21 center dot SAR(1:1) (R-2 = 0.954) and SAR(e) = 2.22 center dot SAR(1:5) (R-2 = 0.828). The linearity of the SAR(e)-SAR(1:5) relationship was stronger when the calcium carbonate content of soils was greater than 4%. Linear relationships were also observed between the electrical conductivity (EC) relationships ECe-EC1:1 and ECe-EC1:5 and between the concentrations of ions Na+, Ca2+ and Mg2+ derived from saturated paste extract and each of the 1:1 and 1:5 extracts. The 1:1 method was more effective than the 1:5 method in the prediction of EC, SAR and ion concentrations of the preferred index of the saturated paste extract method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据