4.7 Article

Combustion optimization in consolidated porous media for thermo-photovoltaic system application Using Response Surface Methodology

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2022.107950

关键词

Porous media; Pre -mixed combustion; Response surface methodology; Thermo -photovoltaic; Optimization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the optimization of an MTPV system by analyzing different porous media (PM) geometries. Results showed that the spherical PM structure had the highest methane conversion rate and wall temperature. The best operating conditions were found to be a diameter ratio of 0.7, porosity of 0.5, equivalence ratio of 0.8, and wall thermal conductivity of 22.99 W/(m center dot K).
Motivated by the need to optimize the operation of an MTPV system, three consolidated porous media (PM) geometries namely spherical, conical and cylindrical and a non-PM combustor are numerically simulated. The geometry with the best methane conversion rate is identified and optimized with the right porous media and combustor diameter ratio. Using Response Surface Methodology, a design of experiment (DOE) approach is adopted to examine the effects of three independent parameters namely: wall thermal conductivity, chamber radius and O2 mass fraction on output parameters critical to the operation of the MTPV system specifically ra-diation heat transfer rate and emitter efficiency. Results show that PM combustion produces higher and uniform wall temperatures compared to the non-PM combustor. The spherical shape consolidated PM produces the highest average methane conversion rate of 96.8% and highest mean wall temperature of 1032 K even though it produces the least flame temperature. The highest radiation heat transfer rate predicted by DOE and CFD sim-ulations are 3.25 W and 3.17 W respectively. The best conditions to realize the optimal MTPV performance is by employing the spherical PM combustor with diameter ratio of 0.7, porosity of 0.5, equivalence ratio of 0.8, wall thermal conductivity of 22.99 W/(m center dot K).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据