4.6 Article

A hybrid classification method with dual-channel CNN and KELM for hyperspectral remote sensing images

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING
卷 44, 期 1, 页码 289-310

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2022.2162352

关键词

hyperspectral remote sensing image classification; dual-channel convolutional neural network; principal component analysis; local binary pattern; kernel extreme learning machine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a hybrid classification method based on dual-channel convolutional neural network (DC-CNN) and kernel extreme learning machine (KELM), called PLDC-KELM, to improve spatial-spectral feature extraction ability and classification accuracy of hyperspectral remote sensing images (HRSI).
In this paper, a hybrid classification method based on dual-channel convolutional neural network (DC-CNN) and kernel extreme learning machine (KELM), namely PLDC-KELM, is proposed to improve the spatial-spectral feature extraction ability and hyperspectral remote sensing image (HRSI) classification accuracy. In the proposed PLDC-KELM, principal component analysis (PCA) is employed to reduce the dimensionality of original HRSI, and local binary pattern (LBP) is utilized to extract spatial features from the data after dimensionality reduction, and the one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) model is constructed to extract deep spatial features from the dimensionality-reduced spatial features. The secure connection layers of two 1D-CNN models are connected to fuse deep spectral and spatial features. Finally, the fused features are input into KELM in order to realize an HRSI classification method. Indian Pines data, Pavia University data, and Salinas data are used to prove the effectiveness of the PLDC-KELM. The experimental results show that the PLDC-KELM method can achieve classification accuracy of 99.95%, 99.98%, and 99.97%, respectively. It is an effective method for hyperspectral remote sensing image classification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据