4.7 Article

Transportation strategies for dynamic lot sizing: single or multiple modes?

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH
卷 61, 期 20, 页码 7064-7084

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2022.2145516

关键词

Transportation strategy; mode selection; transportation costs; inventory management; lot sizing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The complexity of decision-making in purchasing transportation services has increased due to the availability of more options and pricing schedules. This study focuses on a real-world decision problem faced by a Scandinavian company and proposes a novel multi-mode lot-sizing model to illustrate the cost impact of accurately modeling transportation costs and allowing flexible usage of transportation modes. The study concludes that increasing the flexibility of mode selection in transportation strategies can significantly reduce costs.
The complexity of decision-making for companies buying transportation services has increased due to the presence of more options and pricing schedules for transportation. Many companies make transportation and inventory decisions in an uncoordinated way and select only one transportation mode, missing opportunities for logistics cost savings. The experimental study in this paper is based on a real-world decision problem faced by a Scandinavian company that distributes fast-moving consumer goods and wants to determine its transportation strategy. We propose a novel multi-mode lot-sizing model with dynamic deterministic demand to illustrate the cost impact of accurately modelling piecewise-linear transportation costs and allowing a more flexible usage of transportation modes when planning order replenishments. We compare three transportation strategies with increasing degrees of flexibility: two single mode strategies, where one strategy is more flexible than the other, and a multi-mode strategy. We conclude that managers can significantly reduce costs by increasing the flexibility of mode selection in transportation strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据