4.7 Review

The Role of Tumor Microenvironment in Regulating the Plasticity of Osteosarcoma Cells

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms232416155

关键词

osteosarcoma; cancer stem cell; cell plastic; tumor microenvironment

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. Programs of Guangdong Science and Technology
  3. [31871413]
  4. [2017B020230002]
  5. [2016B030231001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Osteosarcoma, an increasingly common malignancy in adolescents, is associated with the presence of osteosarcoma stem cells (OSCs) that contribute to malignant progression and therapy resistance. The unique properties of OSCs, such as self-renewal, multilineage differentiation, and metastatic potential, are closely regulated by the tumor microenvironment. Novel strategies targeting OSC plasticity and modulation of the tumor microenvironment are being explored for the treatment of osteosarcoma.
Osteosarcoma (OS) is a malignancy that is becoming increasingly common in adolescents. OS stem cells (OSCs) form a dynamic subset of OS cells that are responsible for malignant progression and chemoradiotherapy resistance. The unique properties of OSCs, including self-renewal, multilineage differentiation and metastatic potential, 149 depend closely on their tumor microenvironment. In recent years, the likelihood of its dynamic plasticity has been extensively studied. Importantly, the tumor microenvironment appears to act as the main regulatory component of OS cell plasticity. For these reasons aforementioned, novel strategies for OS treatment focusing on modulating OS cell plasticity and the possibility of modulating the composition of the tumor microenvironment are currently being explored. In this paper, we review recent studies describing the phenomenon of OSCs and factors known to influence phenotypic plasticity. The microenvironment, which can regulate OSC plasticity, has great potential for clinical exploitation and provides different perspectives for drug and treatment design for OS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据