4.7 Article

Yeast Mannan-Rich Fraction Modulates Endogenous Reactive Oxygen Species Generation and Antibiotic Sensitivity in Resistant E. coli

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms24010218

关键词

antimicrobial resistance; yeast mannan fraction; bacterial metabolism; antibiotic susceptibility; reactive oxygen species

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Mannan-rich fraction (MRF) isolated from Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been found to be beneficial for animal intestinal health. In this study, it was observed that MRF affects the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and antibiotic susceptibility in resistant Escherichia coli through modulation of bacterial metabolism. Furthermore, proteomics-based analysis revealed that MRF supplementation leads to significant changes in key metabolic pathways, including glycolysis-TCA cycle, thus enhancing bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics (p <= 0.05).
Mannan-rich fraction (MRF) isolated from Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been studied for its beneficial impact on animal intestinal health. Herein, we examined how MRF affected the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), impacting antibiotic susceptibility in resistant Escherichia coli through the modulation of bacterial metabolism. The role of MRF in effecting proteomic change was examined using a proteomics-based approach. The results showed that MRF, when combined with bactericidal antibiotic treatment, increased ROS production in resistant E. coli by 59.29 +/- 4.03% compared to the control (p <= 0.05). We further examined the effect of MRF alone and in combination with antibiotic treatment on E. coli growth and explored how MRF potentiates bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics via proteomic changes in key metabolic pathways. Herein we demonstrated that MRF supplementation in the growth media of ampicillin-resistant E. coli had a significant impact on the normal translational control of the central metabolic pathways, including those involved in the glycolysis-TCA cycle (p <= 0.05).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据