4.7 Article

Hypothermia Does Not Boost the Neuroprotection Promoted by Umbilical Cord Blood Cells in a Neonatal Hypoxia-Ischemia Rat Model

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms24010257

关键词

neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy; umbilical cord blood cells; cell therapy; therapeutic hypothermia; neonatal brain injury

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) is a major cause of death and long-term disability in the perinatal period. Therapeutic hypothermia (HT) is the standard treatment, but its efficacy is limited. Umbilical cord blood cells (UCBC) therapy has been proposed as a potential treatment for neonatal HIE. This study evaluated the effects of UCBC combined with HT and found that the combination therapy improved brain lesions and functional outcomes in neonatal HIE.
Neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) is one of the leading causes of death and long-term disability in the perinatal period. Currently, therapeutic hypothermia is the standard of care for this condition with modest efficacy and strict enrollment criteria. Therapy with umbilical cord blood cells (UCBC) has come forward as a strong candidate for the treatment of neonatal HIE, but no preclinical studies have yet compared the action of UCBC combined with hypothermia (HT) with the action of each therapy by itself. Thus, to evaluate the potential of each therapeutic approach, a hypoxic-ischemic brain lesion was induced in postnatal day ten rat pups; two hours later, HT was applied for 4 h; and 24, 48, and 72 h post-injury, UCBC were administered intravenously. The neonatal hypoxic-ischemic injury led to a brain lesion involving about 48% of the left hemisphere that was not improved by HT (36%) or UCBC alone (28%), but only with the combined therapies (25%; p = 0.0294). Moreover, a decrease in glial reactivity and improved functional outcomes were observed in both groups treated with UCBC. Overall, these results support UCBC as a successful therapeutic approach for HIE, even when treatment with therapeutic hypothermia is not possible.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据