Poor mobility predicts adverse outcome better than other frailty indices in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation

BackgroundSurgical risk scoring systems are poor at predicting outcome in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Frailty indices might more accurately predict outcome. Aims: To examine multiple frailty indices as markers of performance to see whether they predict outcomes both in the shorter (30 days) and longer terms (5 years) in patients who have undergone TAVI. MethodsFrailty indices (Mobility; Brighton Mobility Index, New York Heart Association (NYHA), Karnofsky Performance Index, Canadian Study Health Association (CSHA) clinical frailty scale, and Katz Index of Dependence) were assessed in 312 consecutive TAVI patients. Mortality tracking was obtained from the Office of National Statistics as of May 2014. ResultsMean age was 81.27.0 years; 53.2% were male. Mean Logistic EuroSCORE and STS were 17.4 +/- 9.4 and 4.6 +/- 2.8, respectively. Mean peak aortic valve gradient and aortic valve area were 79.1 +/- 28.0 mm Hg and 0.72 +/- 0.25 cm(2), respectively. 30-day mortality was 4.8%; long-term mortality (maximum 5.8 years, mean 2.2 +/- 1.5 years) was 25.3%. Both univariate and multivariate analyses confirmed poor mobility (defined as severe impairment of mobility secondary to musculoskeletal or neurological dysfunction (Euroscore II risk)), as the best predictor of adverse outcome over both the short-term (OR 4.03, 95% CI (1.36-11.96), P=0.012 (30 days)) and longer term (OR 2.15, 95% CI (1.33-3.48), P=0.002, (2.2 +/- 1.5 years.)). ConclusionPoor mobility predicts worse survival among patients undergoing TAVI, both in the shorter and longer terms. Our data suggest that mobility impairment, of either neurological or musculoskeletal etiology, is an appropriate screening measure when considering patients for TAVI. (c) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.