4.7 Article

Opposing Effects of Interleukin-36γ and Interleukin-38 on Trained Immunity

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms24032311

关键词

IL-36; IL-38; innate immune memory; epigenetics; immunometabolism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Trained immunity is the long-term functional reprogramming of innate immune cells after exposure to pathogens, vaccines, or their ligands. It is mediated through epigenetic and metabolic mechanisms and can also be induced by endogenous compounds and cytokines.
Trained immunity is the process of long-term functional reprogramming (a de facto innate immune memory) of innate immune cells such as monocytes and macrophages after an exposure to pathogens, vaccines, or their ligands. The induction of trained immunity is mediated through epigenetic and metabolic mechanisms. Apart from exogenous stimuli, trained immunity can be induced by endogenous compounds such as oxidized LDL, urate, fumarate, but also cytokines including IL-1 alpha and IL-1 beta. Here, we show that also recombinant IL-36 gamma, a pro-inflammatory cytokine of the IL-1-family, is able to induce trained immunity in primary human monocytes, demonstrated by higher cytokine responses and an increase in cellular metabolic pathways both regulated by epigenetic histone modifications. These effects could be inhibited by the IL-36 receptor antagonist as well as by IL-38, an anti-inflammatory cytokine of the IL-1 family which shares its main receptor with IL-36 (IL-1R6). Further, we demonstrated that trained immunity induced by IL-36 gamma is mediated by NF-kappa B and mTOR signaling. The inhibitory effect of IL-38 on IL-36 gamma-induced trained immunity was confirmed in experiments using bone marrow of IL-38KO and WT mice. These results indicate that exposure to IL-36 gamma results in long-term pro-inflammatory changes in monocytes which can be inhibited by IL-38. Recombinant IL-38 could therefore potentially be used as a therapeutic intervention for diseases characterized by exacerbated trained immunity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据