4.7 Article

Low Specificity but Dissimilar Mycorrhizal Communities Associating with Roots May Contribute to the Spatial Pattern of Four Co-Occurring Habenaria (Orchidaceae) Species

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms24010665

关键词

Habenaria; orchid mycorrhizal fungi (OMF); endophytic fungi; fungi communities; network structure; co-occurring

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using 454 amplicon pyrosequencing, this study investigated the spatial variations in the community of orchid mycorrhizal fungi (OMF) and endophytic fungi in the roots of four co-occurring Habenaria species. The results showed that different fungi communities contribute to the spatial separation of these four species.
Fungi with orchid roots have been increasingly proven to play important roles in orchid growth, spatial distribution, and coexistence of natural communities. Here, we used 454 amplicon pyrosequencing with two different primer combinations to investigate the spatial variations in the community of OMF and endophytic fungi associates within the roots of four co-occurring Habenaria species. The results showed that all investigated Habenaria species were generalists and the different fungi communities may contribute to the spatial separation of the four Habenaria species. Firstly, the fungal OTUs identified in the roots of the four species overlapped but their presence differed amongst species and numerous distinct OMF families were unique to each species. Second, NMDS clustering showed samples clustered together based on associated species and PERMANOVA analyses indicated that fungi communities in the roots differed significantly between the Habenaria species, both for all endophytic fungi communities and for OMF communities. Third, the network structure of epiphytic fungi was highly specialized and modular but demonstrated lowly connected and anti-nested properties. However, it calls for more soil nutrition and soil fungal communities' studies to elucidate the contribution of habitat-specific adaptations in general and mycorrhizal divergence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据