4.7 Article

Spawning-Induced pH Increase Activates Sperm Attraction and Fertilization Abilities in Eggs of the Ascidian, Phallusia philippinensis and Ciona intestinalis

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms24032666

关键词

ascidian; fertilizing ability; sperm chemotaxis; oocyte maturation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In Phlebobranchiata ascidians, the acidic conditions in the gonoductal fluids keep the gametes infertile, especially the eggs, and the release of eggs into seawater upon spawning induces an increase in ambient pH, which enables egg fertilization. Pre-incubation of gonoductal eggs at pH 8.2 prior to insemination increases fertilization rates, even under low pH conditions. An increase in ambient pH triggers the release of sperm attractants from the egg and is necessary for sperm chemotaxis.
In Phlebobranchiata ascidians, oocytes and spermatozoa are stored in the oviduct and spermiduct, respectively, until spawning occurs. Gametes in the gonoducts are mature and fertilizable; however, it was found that the gametes of the ascidians Phallusia philippinensis and Ciona intestinalis could not undergo fertilization in the gonoductal fluids. The body fluids of the ascidians, especially in the gonoducts, were much more acidic (pH 5.5-6.8) than seawater (pH 8.2), and the fertilization rate was low under such acidic conditions. Hence, we examined the effect of pH on gametes. Pre-incubation of gonoductal eggs at pH 8.2 prior to insemination increased fertilization rates, even when insemination was performed under low pH conditions. Furthermore, an increase in ambient pH induced an increase in the intracellular pH of the eggs. It was also found that an increase in ambient pH triggered the release of sperm attractants from the egg and is therefore necessary for sperm chemotaxis. Hence, acidic conditions in the gonoductal fluids keep the gametes, especially eggs, infertile, and the release of eggs into seawater upon spawning induces an increase in ambient pH, which enables egg fertilization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据