4.7 Review

The Microbiome in Systemic Sclerosis: Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Potential

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms232416154

关键词

systemic sclerosis; microbiota; animal model; bioavailability; oral drugs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Systemic sclerosis, also known as scleroderma, is an autoimmune disease that affects multiple organs. Recent research has found a connection between the gut microbiota and scleroderma, suggesting novel therapeutic possibilities. This review summarizes the current understanding of the molecular mechanisms of scleroderma and the role of the microbiome, as well as discusses potential treatment interventions.
Systemic sclerosis (SSc), also known as scleroderma, is an autoimmune disease with unknown etiology characterized by multi-organ fibrosis. Despite substantial investigation on SSc-related cellular and molecular mechanisms, effective therapies are still lacking. The skin, lungs, and gut are the most affected organs in SSc, which act as physical barriers and constantly communicate with colonized microbiota. Recent reports have documented a unique microbiome signature, which may be the pathogenic trigger or driver of SSc. Since gut microbiota influences the efficacy and toxicity of oral drugs, evaluating drug-microbiota interactions has become an area of interest in disease treatment. The existing evidence highlights the potential of the microbial challenge as a novel therapeutic option in SSc. In this review, we have summarized the current knowledge about molecular mechanisms of SSc and highlighted the underlying role of the microbiome in SSc pathogenesis. We have also discussed the latest therapeutic interventions using microbiomes in SSc, including drug-microbiota interactions and animal disease models. This review aims to elucidate the pathophysiological connection and therapeutic potential of the microbiome in SSc. Insights into the microbiome will significantly improve our understanding of etiopathogenesis and developing therapeutics for SSc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据