4.7 Article

Molecular Characteristics of Subgenomic RNAs and the Cap-Dependent Translational Advantage Relative to Corresponding Genomic RNAs of Tomato spotted wilt virus

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms232315074

关键词

tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV); subgenomic RNAs (sgRNAs); cap-dependent translation; ambisense RNA virus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study identified the molecular characteristics of subgenomic RNAs (sgRNAs) in Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) that contribute to viral protein expression. The 3' ends of sgRNAs have A-rich characteristics and are conserved among different TSWV isolates. Additionally, the untranslated regions (UTRs) of sgRNA-Ns can enhance cap-dependent translation. These findings enrich the understanding of sgRNAs in ambisense RNA viruses.
Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) causes severe viral diseases on many economically important plants of Solanaceae. During the infection process of TSWV, a series of 3 '-truncated subgenomic RNAs (sgRNAs) relative to corresponding genomic RNAs were synthesized, which were responsible for the expression of some viral proteins. However, corresponding genomic RNAs (gRNAs) seem to possess the basic elements for expression of these viral proteins. In this study, molecular characteristics of sgRNAs superior to genomic RNAs in viral protein expression were identified. The 3 ' ends of sgRNAs do not cover the entire intergenic region (IGR) of TSWV genomic RNAs and contain the remarkable A-rich characteristics. In addition, the 3 ' terminal nucleotides of sgRNAs are conserved among different TSWV isolates. Based on the eIF4E recruitment assay and subsequent northern blot, it is suggested that the TSWV sgRNA, but not gRNA, is capped in vivo; this is why sgRNA is competent for protein expression relative to gRNA. In addition, the 5 ' and 3 ' untranslated region (UTR) of sgRNA-Ns can synergistically enhance cap-dependent translation. This study further enriched the understanding of sgRNAs of ambisense RNA viruses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据