4.7 Article

Loss of Runx1 Induces Granulosa Cell Defects and Development of Ovarian Tumors in the Mouse

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms232214442

关键词

RUNX1; ovary; granulosa cells; tumor; cancer

资金

  1. Intramural Research Program of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [Z01-ES102965]
  2. NIH Postbaccalaureate Intramural Research Training Award Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reveals the significance of the Runx1 gene in mouse ovarian development. Loss of Runx1 leads to an increased prevalence of ovarian tumors and also affects normal granulosa cell differentiation.
Genetic alterations of the RUNX1 gene are associated with a variety of malignancies, including female-related cancers. The role of RUNX1 as either a tumor suppressor gene or an oncogene is tissue-dependent and varies based on the cancer type. Both the amplification and deletion of the RUNX1 gene have been associated with ovarian cancer in humans. In this study, we investigated the effects of Runx1 loss on ovarian pathogenesis in mice. A conditional loss of Runx1 in the somatic cells of the ovary led to an increased prevalence of ovarian tumors in aged mice. By the age of 15 months, 27% of Runx1 knockout (KO) females developed ovarian tumors that presented characteristics of granulosa cell tumors. While ovaries from young adult mice did not display tumors, they all contained abnormal follicle-like lesions. The granulosa cells composing these follicle-like lesions were quiescent, displayed defects in differentiation and were organized in a rosette-like pattern. The RNA-sequencing analysis further revealed differentially expressed genes in Runx1 KO ovaries, including genes involved in metaplasia, ovarian cancer, epithelial cell development, tight junctions, cell-cell adhesion, and the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway. Together, this study showed that Runx1 is required for normal granulosa cell differentiation and prevention of ovarian tumor development in mice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据