4.7 Review

Pathogenesis of Dementia

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms24010543

关键词

dementia; Alzheimer's disease; brain energy metabolism; cognitive metabolism; brain aging; neurodegenerative disorders

向作者/读者索取更多资源

According to Alzheimer's Disease International, there are 55 million people worldwide living with dementia, which is a set of symptoms resulting from brain damage. The symptoms involve progressive impairments in memory, thinking, and behavior, often accompanied by emotional problems, language difficulties, and decreased motivation. Although attempts to treat dementia by addressing symptoms have failed, this narrative review aims to explain the etiology of dementia and Alzheimer's disease through the perspective of energy and cognitive metabolism dysfunction in an aging brain.
According to Alzheimer's Disease International, 55 million people worldwide are living with dementia. Dementia is a disorder that manifests as a set of related symptoms, which usually result from the brain being damaged by injury or disease. The symptoms involve progressive impairments in memory, thinking, and behavior, usually accompanied by emotional problems, difficulties with language, and decreased motivation. The most common variant of dementia is Alzheimer's disease with symptoms dominated by cognitive disorders, particularly memory loss, impaired personality, and judgmental disorders. So far, all attempts to treat dementias by removing their symptoms rather than their causes have failed. Therefore, in the presented narrative review, I will attempt to explain the etiology of dementia and Alzheimer's disease from the perspective of energy and cognitive metabolism dysfunction in an aging brain. I hope that this perspective, though perhaps too simplified, will bring us closer to the essence of aging-related neurodegenerative disorders and will soon allow us to develop new preventive/therapeutic strategies in our struggle with dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and Parkinson's disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据