4.7 Review

Focusing on the Emerging Role of Kainate Receptors in the Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus (DCN) and Cerebellum

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms24021718

关键词

KAR; DCN; kainate receptors; dorsal cochlear nucleus; cerebellum; cerebellum-like structure; Purkinje cells; cartwheel cells; fusiform cells; granule cells

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mammals have a dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN) which is similar to the cerebellum in terms of structure and microcircuitry. Both the DCN and cerebellum rely on glutamate receptors to perform their functions. While the distribution and role of KARs in the hippocampus have been extensively studied, little is known about their distribution and role in cerebellum-like structures such as the DCN.
Mammals have a dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN), which is thought to be a cerebellum-like structure with similar features in terms of structure and microcircuitry to the cerebellum. Both the DCN and cerebellum perform their functions depending on synaptic and neuronal networks mediated by various glutamate receptors. Kainate receptors (KARs) are one class of the glutamate receptor family and are strongly expressed in the hippocampus, the cerebellum, and cerebellum-like structures. The cellular distribution and the potential role of KARs in the hippocampus have been extensively investigated. However, the cellular distribution and the potential role of KARs in cerebellum-like structures, including the DCN and cerebellum, are poorly understood. In this review, we summarize the similarity between the DCN and cerebellum at the levels of structure, circuitry, and cell type as well as the investigations referring to the expression patterns of KARs in the DCN and cerebellum according to previous studies. Recent studies on the role of KARs have shown that KARs mediate a bidirectional modulatory effect at parallel fiber (PF)-Purkinje cell (PC) synapses in the cerebellum, implying insights into their roles in cerebellum-like structures, including the DCN, that remain to be explored in the coming years.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据