4.7 Article

Sound reflection by periodic acoustic metasurface in sheared grazing flows

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107895

关键词

Acoustic metasurfaces; Convective generalized Snell?s law; Wavefront manipulation; Sheared flow; Three-dimensions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the reflection performance of periodic acoustic metasurfaces (AMs) under sheared flow. A design method considering the mean flow profile is proposed, and two different acoustic porous metasurfaces (APMs) are numerically tested. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method in achieving desired wavefront manipulations under different flow conditions.
The reflection performance of periodic acoustic metasurfaces (AMs) subjected to a grazing flow, consisting of a uniform region and a finite sheared layer, is studied. A convective generalized Snell's law (CGSL) is derived to account for the effect of uniform mean flows on the reflection of AMs. Then, an AMs design method considering the mean flow profile is proposed based on the impedance transformation method. The strategy is to form a reflected phase gradient at the interface plane between the uniform and the sheared flow regions. The reflection characteristics of two acoustic porous metasurfaces (APMs), i.e., APM1 and APM2 designed for the uniform and the sheared flows, respectively, are numerically investigated. Results show that APM1 achieves efficient anomalous reflections in uniform flows, and the diffracted orders and directions of the reflected waves are well predicted by the proposed CGSL. However, the performance of APM1 deteriorates under oblique incidences if applied to a typical sheared flow. In contrast, APM2 realizes desired wavefront manipulations under the same conditions. Finally, the CGSL is extended into a three-dimensional (3D) space and is validated numerically. This study provides a means for AMs design in flow conditions, which holds good potential in aeroacoustic noise problems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据