HBM4EU from the Coordinator's perspective: lessons learnt from managing a large-scale EU project

We discuss some important management issues of the Human Biomonitoring Initiative (HBM4EU) from the perspective of the Coordinator that may be valuable for the design and management of similar projects. As a large-scale international collaborative project, HBM4EU comprised 118 institutions from 30 countries and the European Environment Agency and had a budget of about (sic)74 million. It has set up an innovative cooperative network of national and EU authorities and scientific institutions at the science-policy interface. A project of this scale raises major management challenges and requires transparent, efficient, and well-organized administrative and scientific steering structures. We present four major points: First, prior to the beginning of the project, the Consortium Agreement needs to be well elaborated to prevent conflicts during the project lifetime. Second, a strong role for national and EU policy-making authorities in the administrative governance structure enhances the interest of recipients of project results. Third, large-scale international collaborative projects need an elaborate and well-financed scientific governance structure. Fourth, a differentiation of funding rates among project activities threatens to create conflicts. HBM4EU provides a prototype for EU funded large-scale projects targeting future policies for realizing the Green Deal and Zero Pollution Ambition in the field of chemicals, health, and environment.

Automated summary

In this article, we discuss important management issues faced by the Human Biomonitoring Initiative (HBM4EU) from the perspective of the Coordinator. HBM4EU is a large-scale international collaborative project involving 118 institutions from 30 countries and the European Environment Agency, with a budget of approximately EUR 74 million. The project has established an innovative cooperative network between national and EU authorities and scientific institutions, focusing on the science-policy interface. The article presents four major points related to the project's management, including the need for a well-elaborated Consortium Agreement, the importance of involvement from policy-making authorities, the necessity of a well-financed scientific governance structure, and the potential conflicts created by differential funding rates among project activities. HBM4EU serves as a prototype for future EU-funded large-scale projects addressing the Green Deal and Zero Pollution Ambition in the fields of chemicals, health, and environment.