4.7 Article

Database of thermophysical properties of H2/CO2/CO/CH4/H2O mixtures

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 48, 期 44, 页码 16923-16935

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.01.066

关键词

Hydrogen; Gas mixture; Thermophysical properties; Equation of state; Database

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrogen has attracted attention as a potential alternative to fossil fuel due to its renewable and environmentally friendly properties. Accurate estimations of the thermodynamic and thermophysical properties of hydrogen-containing mixtures are essential for efficiently designing hydrogen energy systems. This study introduced methods for calculating these properties and established a technical database covering a wide range of compositions, pressures, and temperatures. A user-friendly software called H2MixThermoDatabase was compiled to facilitate further developments in hydrogen energy systems.
As a potential alternative to fossil fuel, hydrogen has attracted much attention due to its renewable and environmentally friendly properties. Systems built for hydrogen-production and hydrogen-application tend to be larger, more integrated and more complex. In order to more efficiently design the vital components of hydrogen energy systems, accurate esti -mations of the thermodynamic and thermophysical properties of hydrogen-containing mixtures involved is essential. In this study, we introduced methods typically for calcu-lating the thermodynamic and thermophysical properties of H2/CO2/CO/CH4/H2O mixtures, and established the technical database covering a wide range of mole fractions, pressures and temperatures. Moreover, a user-friendly software integrating all the calculation methods called H2MixThermoDatabase is compiled, whose code has been made available on the GitHub page for other researchers to effectually facilitate the further developments of hydrogen energy system.(c) 2023 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据