4.7 Article

Highly enhanced proton conductivity of single-step-functionalized graphene oxide/nafion electrolyte membrane towards improved hydrogen fuel cell performance

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 48, 期 29, 页码 11029-11044

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.12.137

关键词

Nafion-based proton exchange; membrane; Single-step-phosphorylation; Graphene oxide; Proton conductivity; Hydrogen fuel cell

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acidic group functionalized graphene oxide (GO) is used to improve the quality of state-of-the-art Nafion electrolytes for next-generation fuel cell application. Single-step-phosphorylated graphene oxide (sPGO) modified Nafion (sPGO/NF) achieves high proton conductivity, chemical durability, and power density under actual fuel cell conditions.
Acidic group functionalized graphene oxide (GO) as a filler to the state-of-art Nafion electrolytes are regarded as potential materials towards next-generation fuel cell application. However, the tedious synthesis process for GO functionalization, and aggravated chemical durability at high temperatures demands the scientific community to design suitable Nafion-based functionalized GO electrolytes with superior proton conductivity and power density at actual fuel cell conditions i.e., 80 degrees C and 100% relative humidity (RH). Herein, a potential single-step-phosphorylated graphene oxide (sPGO) modified Nafion (sPGO/NF) is introduced to simultaneously multifold the proton conductivity, chemical durability, and power density of Nafion. Under actual fuel cell conditions, the sPGO/NF exhibits maximum proton conductivity (0.306 Scm(-1)) which is 1.7-fold and 1.6-fold higher than that of rNF and GO/NF, respectively. Moreover, sPGO/NF achieves the maximum power density of 0.652 Wcm(-2) (80 degrees C, 100% RH), much higher than the rNF (0.51 Wcm(-2)) and GO/NF (0.53 Wcm(-2)) at same condition. (c) 2022 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据