4.7 Review

Review on using the depleted gas reservoirs for the underground H-2 storage: A case study in Niigata prefecture, Japan

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 48, 期 28, 页码 10579-10602

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.12.108

关键词

Underground hydrogen storage; Numerical simulation; Japan Gas fields; Depleted gas reservoirs; Site selection criteria

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reviews the critical parameters for geological analysis and reservoir engineering evaluation of underground hydrogen storage (UHS), and conducts numerical simulations to investigate the impact of these parameters on hydrogen storage capacity. The study identifies Sekihara gas field as a suitable candidate for UHS with a storage capacity of 2.06 million m3 and a depth of 1000 m.
Underground hydrogen storage (UHS) in depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs is a prospective choice to store enormous volumes of hydrogen (H-2). However, these subsurface formations must be able not only to store H2 in an effective and secure manner, but also to produce the required volumes of H-2 upon demand. This paper first reviews the critical parameters to be considered for geological analysis and reservoir engineering evaluation of UHS. The formation depth, the interactions of rock-brine-H-2, the caprock (seal) and well integrity are the most prominent parameters as far as UHS is concerned. In respect of these critical parameters, tentative H-2 storage is screened from the existing gas storage fields in the Niigata prefecture of Japan, and it was revealed that the Sekihara gas field is a suitable candidate for UHS with a storage capacity of 2.06 similar to 108 m(3) and a depth of 1000 m. Then, a series of numerical simulations utilizing CMG software was conducted to find out the extent to which critical parameters alter H2 storage capacity. The results demonstrated that this field, with a recovery factor of 82.7% in the sixth cycle of production is a prospective site for H2 storage. (c) 2022 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据