相关参考文献
注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。Women's lived experiences of induction of labour in late- and post-term pregnancy within the Swedish post-term induction study - a phenomenological study
Helena Nilver et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE STUDIES ON HEALTH AND WELL-BEING (2022)
Patient Satisfaction with Outpatient Cervical Ripening in Parous Women
Michelle J. Wang et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY (2021)
Experiences of induction of labor with a catheter - A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the outpatient and inpatient setting
Henna Haavisto et al.
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA (2021)
Induction of labor using balloon catheter as an outpatient versus prostaglandin as an inpatient: A cost-effectiveness analysis
Katharina M. D. Merollini et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY (2021)
Outpatient Cervical Ripening A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Marian McDonagh et al.
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2021)
Women's childbirth experiences in the Swedish Post-term Induction Study (SWEPIS): a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial
Helena Nilver et al.
BMJ OPEN (2021)
Cervical ripening at home or in-hospital-prospective cohort study and process evaluation (CHOICE) study: a protocol
Sarah Jane Stock et al.
BMJ OPEN (2021)
NICE recommends inducing pregnant women one week earlier
Jacqui Wise
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2021)
Induction of labour indications and timing: A systematic analysis of clinical guidelines />
Dominiek Coates et al.
WOMEN AND BIRTH (2020)
Induction of labour using prostaglandin E2 as an inpatient versus balloon catheter as an outpatient: a multicentre randomised controlled trial
M. Beckmann et al.
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY (2020)
Women's experience of induction of labor using PGE2 as an inpatient versus balloon catheter as an outpatient
Michael Beckmann et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY (2020)
Outpatient Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor in Nulliparous Women A Randomized Controlled Trial
Elizabeth B. Ausbeck et al.
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2020)
Inpatient versus outpatient induction of labour: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Susan Dong et al.
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH (2020)
Induction of labour at 41 weeks or expectant management until 42 weeks: A systematic review and an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised trials
Marten Alkmark et al.
PLOS MEDICINE (2020)
Foley catheter silicone versus latex for term outpatient induction of labour: A randomised trial
Therese M. McGee et al.
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY (2019)
Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management until 42 weeks (INDEX): multicentre, randomised non-inferiority trial
Judit K. J. Keulen et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2019)
Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks (SWEdish Post-term Induction Study, SWEPIS): multicentre, open label, randomised, superiority trial
Ulla-Britt Wennerholm et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2019)
Women's experiences of postterm induction of labor: A systematic review of qualitative studies
Stina Lou et al.
BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE (2019)
Development of a core outcome set for trials on induction of labour: an international multistakeholder Delphi study
F. Dos Santos et al.
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY (2018)
Safety of the balloon catheter for cervical ripening in outpatient care: complications during the period from insertion to expulsion of a balloon catheter in the process of labour induction: a systematic review
M. Diederen et al.
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY (2018)
Outpatient Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor in Parous Women A Randomized Controlled Trial
Spencer G. Kuper et al.
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2018)
Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women
William A. Grobman et al.
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2018)
Outpatient versus inpatient cervix priming with Foley catheter: A randomized trial
Catarina Policiano et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY (2017)
Observational Study of Neonatal Safety for Outpatient Labour Induction Priming with Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert
Geoffrey W. Cundiff et al.
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA (2017)
A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol, and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in the induction of labour
W. Chen et al.
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY (2016)
Patient attitudes towards outpatient cervical ripening prior to induction of labour at an Australian tertiary hospital
Claire Sutton et al.
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY (2016)
Foley catheter induction of labor as an outpatient procedure
H. Kruit et al.
JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY (2016)
Cost-effectiveness of term induction of labour using inpatient prostaglandin gel versus outpatient Foley catheter
Kathryn Austin et al.
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY (2015)
A comparison of inpatient with outpatient balloon catheter cervical ripening: a pilot randomized controlled trial
Chris Wilkinson et al.
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH (2015)
A randomised controlled trial of outpatient compared with inpatient cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 (OPRA study)
C. Wilkinson et al.
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY (2015)
Home Cervical Ripening With Dinoprostone Gel in Nulliparous Women With Singleton Pregnancies
Sarah J. Stock et al.
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2014)
A cost analysis of inpatient compared with outpatient prostaglandin E2 cervical priming for induction of labour: results from the OPRA trial
Pamela L. Adelson et al.
AUSTRALIAN HEALTH REVIEW (2013)
Psychosocial Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Outpatient Cervical Priming for Induction of Labor
Deborah Turnbull et al.
BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE (2013)
Women's experiences of outpatient induction of labour with remote continuous monitoring
Ediri O'Brien et al.
MIDWIFERY (2013)
Outpatient Foley catheter versus inpatient prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour: a randomised trial
Amanda Henry et al.
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH (2013)
The impact of outpatient priming for induction of labour on midwives' work demand, work autonomy and satisfaction
Deborah Turnbull et al.
WOMEN AND BIRTH (2013)
Inpatient versus outpatient cervical priming for induction of labour: Therapeutic landscapes and women's preferences
Candice Oster et al.
HEALTH & PLACE (2011)
Women's experiences of labour and birth: an evolutionary concept analysis
Patricia Larkin et al.
MIDWIFERY (2009)
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration
Alessandro Liberati et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2009)
GRADE:: what is quality of evidence and why is it important to clinicians?
Gordon H. Guyatt et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2008)
Induction of labor with three different techniques at 41 weeks of gestation or spontaneous follow-up until 42 weeks in women with definitely unfavorable cervical scores
O Gelisen et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY (2005)
分享论文
