4.5 Article

Ohmic baking of gluten-free bread: role of non-gluten protein on GF bread structure and properties

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ijfs.16206

关键词

Gluten-free bread; non-gluten protein; ohmic heating; rheology; solubility

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study assessed the influence of non-gluten protein from different sources (plant and animal) on the rheological behavior of gluten-free batter and the quality of bread after baking. The results showed that egg albumin and potato proteins exhibited the best functionality in gluten-free bread, with potato protein having the potential to replace egg albumin. Protein solubility was found to be important for foam stability and emulsification properties, thus improving the quality of gluten-free bread.
Batter stabilisation presents a great challenge for gluten-free (GF) bread, as CO2 is released during bread-making process, resulting in small, dense and crumbly breads. Apart from starch, protein plays a crucial role in gas cell stabilisation. This study aims to assess the effect of non-gluten protein from different sources (plant and animal) on GF batter's rheological behaviour (pasting properties, rheology and foam stability) and on bread properties after baking with conventional and ohmic heating method. Hence, this study evaluated the functional properties (protein solubility, hydrophobicity, sulfhydryl groups, foaming and emulsification properties) of selected non-gluten protein relevant for foam stabilisation. Furthermore, a correlation matrix was established by involving the functional properties of the proteins and their interaction with starch on batter rheology and bread quality. Among proteins, egg albumin and potato proteins were reported to perform superior functionality in GF bread; in particular, potato protein generated breads with the highest volume for both baking methods, which was potential to replace egg albumin. According to the correlation matrix, protein solubility was required in foaming and emulsification behaviour to improve GF bread properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据