4.5 Article

Influence of sanxan on the quality of salt-free frozen-cooked wheat noodles during freeze-thaw cycles

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ijfs.16201

关键词

Freeze-thaw cycles; quality; salt-free frozen-cooked wheat noodles; sanxan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the use of sanxan to improve the quality of salt-free frozen-cooked wheat noodles (FCNs) and explores the underlying mechanism. The results demonstrate that adding sanxan can minimize the decrease in quality parameters and improve the chrominance and thermal stability of salt-free FCNs during freeze-thaw treatments (FTs).
Developing salt-free frozen-cooked wheat noodles (FCNs) has a promising future, and how to eliminate the deficiency of the absence of salt is key to enhance its quality. In this study, based on the unique 'gel-forming in cold water and gel strength-strengthening during heating' properties, sanxan was used to improve the quality of salt-free FCNs and the underlying mechanism was initially explored. TPA analysis, colour profile, thermal stability analysis, determination of free sulfhydryl and disulphide bonds contents, scanning electron microscopy observation, confocal laser scanning microscopy observation were carried out. The results showed that adding 1.2% sanxan could minimise the decrease in hardness, springiness, maximum tensile strength and tensile fracture distance, and the increase in adhesiveness of salt-free FCNs during freeze-thaw treatments (FTs). The chrominance and thermal stability of salt-free FCNs during FTs were also improved by adding 1.2% sanxan. Adding sanxan could strengthen the gluten network of salt-free FCNs by weakening the recrystallisation of ice crystals, inhibiting the breakage of SS and enhancing the cross-linkage degree and continuity of gluten network during FTs. The current study could develop a new preparation strategy of salt-free convenient noodles and provide theoretical basis for expanding the novel application of sanxan in frozen foods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据