4.4 Article

Numerical Insights Into the Influences of Chloride Baths Conditions on FeCoNi Ternary Alloy Electrodeposition

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.20964/2022.12.52

关键词

FeCoNi electrodeposition; throwing power; covering power; numerical simulation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electrodeposition of Fe-rich FeCoNi ternary alloys is an important and cost-effective surface fabrication method. In this study, finite element analysis was used to model the codeposition of a FeCoNi ternary alloy and investigate the influences of operating conditions. The simulation results were validated by experimental results, showing excellent correspondence. The effects of operating conditions on cathode polarization, current efficiency, and throwing and covering power were investigated via simulation, providing data for the industrial design and manufacture of FeCoNi alloy electrodeposition.
Electrodeposition of Fe-rich FeCoNi ternary alloys is an important and cost-effective surface fabrication method. It is necessary to investigate the influences of electrodeposition conditions in a systematic method. Finite element analysis (FEA) is an economical and time-saving way to study the numerous parameters during electrodeposition. In this work, the tertiary current distribution was used to model the codeposition of a FeCoNi ternary alloy, considering the intermediate absorption and hydrogen evolution reaction on the cathode. A comparative study between simulation and experiment in terms of the influences of operating conditions was conducted. Meanwhile, the experimental results validated the simulation models, showing excellent correspondence between the simulation and the experiment. Finally, the effects of operating conditions such as current density, bath temperature, bulk pH and electrolyte composition on cathode polarization, current efficiency, and throwing and covering power were investigated via simulation. The results can provide data for the industrial design and manufacture of FeCoNi alloy electrodeposition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据