Impact of core laboratory assessment on treatment decisions and clinical outcomes using combined fractional flow reserve and coronary flow reserve measurements-DEFINE-FLOW core laboratory sub-study

Objective: The role of combined FFR/CFR measurements in decision-making on coronary revascularization re-mains unclear. DEFINE-FLOW prospectively assessed the relationship of FFR/CFR agreement with 2-year major adverse cardiac event (MACE) and target vessel failure (TVF) rates, and uniquely included core-laboratory analysis of all pressure and flow tracings. We aimed to document the impact of core-laboratory analysis on lesion classification, and the relationship between core-laboratory fractional flow reserve (FFR) and coronary flow reserve (CFR) values with clinical outcomes and angina burden during follow-up. Methods: In 398 vessels (348 patients) considered for intervention, >= 1 coronary pressure/flow tracing was approved by the core-laboratory. Revascularization was performed only when both FFR(<= 0.80) and CFR(<2.0) were abnormal, all others were treated medically. Results: MACE was lowest for concordant normal FFR/CFR, but was not significantly different compared with either discordant group (low FFR/normal CFR: HR:1.63; 95%CI:0.61-4.40; P = 0.33; normal FFR/low CFR: HR:1.81; 95%CI:0.66-4.98; P = 0.25). Moreover, MACE did not differ between discordant groups treated medically and the concordant abnormal group undergoing revascularization (normal FFR/low CFR: HR:0.63; 95%CI:0.23-1.73;P = 0.37; normal FFR/low CFR: HR:0.70; 95%CI:0.22-2.21;P = 0.54). Similar findings applied to TVF. Conclusions: Patients with concordantly normal FFR/CFR have very low 2-year MACE and TVF rates. Throughout follow-up, there were no differences in event rates between patients in whom revascularization was deferred due to preserved CFR despite reduced FFR, and those in whom PCI was performed due to concordantly low FFR and CFR. These findings question the need for routine revascularization in vessels showing low FFR but preserved CFR. Clinical trial registration: http://ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02328820

Automated summary

This study highlights the importance of core laboratory analysis in evaluating lesion classification and clinical outcomes when performing combined coronary flow reserve (CFR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements. The agreement between FFR/CFR results is associated with a lower risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and target vessel failure (TVF), raising doubts about the necessity of routine revascularization in vessels with low FFR but preserved CFR.