4.5 Article

Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy Associated With Altered Transverse Compressive and Axial Tensile Strain During Ankle Dorsiflexion

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH
卷 35, 期 4, 页码 910-915

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jor.23338

关键词

ultrasound elastography; Achilles tendonitis; heel lift; tendon mechanics

资金

  1. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases [AR067484]
  2. NIH/NIAMS [NIH P30 AR061307]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purposes of this case-control study (N=20) were to examine the effects of insertional Achilles tendinopathy (IAT) and tendon region on tendon strain in patients with IAT compared to a control group without tendinopathy. An ultrasound transducer was positioned over the Achilles tendon insertion during dorsiflexion tasks, which included standing and partial squat. A non-rigid image registration-based algorithm was used to estimate transverse compressive and axial tensile strains of the tendon from radiofrequency ultrasound images, which was segmented into two regions (superficial tendon and deep). For transverse compressive strain, two-way mixed effects ANOVAs demonstrated that there were interaction effects between group and tendon region for both dorsiflexion tasks (Heel lowering, p=0.004; Partial squat, p=0.008). For axial tensile strain, the IAT group demonstrated a main effect of lower tensile strain than the control group (Standing, p=0.001; Partial squat, p=0.033). There was also a main effect of greater tensile strain in the superficial region of the tendon compared to the deep during standing (p=0.002), but not during partial squat (p=0.603). Reduced transverse compressive and axial tensile strains in the IAT group indicate altered mechanical properties specific to the region of IAT pathology. Additionally, patterns of compressive strain are consistent with the theory of calcaneal impingement contributing to IAT pathology. (c) 2016 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据