4.6 Article

Cooperative human-robot polishing for the task of patina growing on high-quality leather shoes

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-022-10620-6

关键词

Robotics; Industry; Human-robot; Collaborative robot; Shoe

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A patina is the aged appearance that leather develops over time, which can also be artificially created through specific products. Manual finishing operations on objects require skilled artisans and present challenges for automation. This research presents a new method using cooperative robotics for automatic and semi-automatic shoe patina growing in the footwear industry. The implemented system saves operator time without compromising the quality of the finishing work.
A patina is essentially the weathered look a piece of leather takes on as it ages. The patina finishing aspect can be also generated or grown artificially by scrubbing the leather surface with specific products. These kinds of manual finishing operations on small objects are delicate and regularly need slight corrections carried out by skilled artisans, which adds complexity to the process automation and implies various key aspects to consider. This research presents a novel approach for automatic and semiautomatic shoe patina growing in the footwear industry using a new co-creative method based on cooperative robotics. The system automates the process in pursuit of operator time-saving without reducing the work finishing quality. For this purpose, the use of a collaborative robot with a built-in constant contact force control and a collaborative tool are used in this research. The use of both tools in complementarity with the knowledge of the craftsman leads the robot end-effector adaptation to the inherent curved surfaces over the shoe. Besides, some orientation corrections are applied based on the CAD model for the task to be accurately accomplished. The solution has been successfully integrated in a real production line, and it is currently in use.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据