4.5 Article

Dentine thickness in maxillary fused molars depends on the fusion type: An ex vivo micro-computed tomography study

期刊

INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL
卷 56, 期 5, 页码 637-646

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/iej.13891

关键词

danger zone; dentine thickness; endodontics; fusion; microtomography; root canal anatomy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study used micro-CT to determine and compare the dentine thickness around root canals in fused maxillary molars. Results showed that the dentine thickness significantly decreased 2 mm apical to the orifice level regardless of fusion type. The minimum dentine thickness was found around the second mesiobuccal canal. The fusion type influenced the dentine thickness, with type 1 fusion having greater thickness around the mesiobuccal canal compared to types 2 and 3, while type 3 fusion had thinner dentine around the distobuccal and palatal canals.
AimThe present study aimed to determine and compare the dentine thickness around the root canals of maxillary molars with fusion using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). MethodologyA total of 120 fused maxillary molars having more than a single canal with distinct canal orifices near the cementoenamel junction were selected from a pool of extracted maxillary molars, which were scanned on a micro-CT device (SkyScan 1172, Bruker-microCT). The minimum dentine thickness around the root canals in furcal direction was measured using CTAn software (v.1.18.8 Bruker-microCT) at each millimetre. The specimens were grouped according to their fusion type, and dentine thickness around the canals was compared. The data were statistically analysed using anova and post hoc Tukey-Kramer tests following an assessment of the normality of their distribution with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (p < .05). ResultsDentine thickness showed a statistically significant decrease at 2 mm apical to the orifice level irrespective of fusion type. The minimum dentine thickness values were detected around the second mesiobuccal canal as 0.30 mm at 6 mm below orifice. Dentine thickness around the mesiobuccal canal was significantly greater in fusion type 1 than those of types 2 and 3 (p < .05), while those of distobuccal and palatal canals were significantly thinner in type 3 fusion compared with type 1 or 6 (pDentine thickness showed a statistically significant decrease at 2 mm apical to the orifice level irrespective of fusion type. The minimum dentine thickness values were detected around the second mesiobuccal canal as 0.30 mm at 6 mm below orifice. Dentine thickness around the mesiobuccal canal was significantly greater in fusion type 1 than those of types 2 and 3 ( ConclusionMinimum dentine thickness values at the danger zone of distobuccal and palatal canals change according to the fusion type in fused maxillary second molars.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据