Radiation dose of cone-beam computed tomography compared to conventional radiographs in orthodontics

Objectives The aim of this study was to determine radiation doses of different cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan modes in comparison to a conventional set of orthodontic radiographs (COR) by means of phantom dosimetry. Materials and methods Thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) chips (3 x 1 x 1 mm) were used on an adult male tissue-equivalent phantom to record the distribution of the absorbed radiation dose. Three different scanning modes (i.e., portrait, normal landscape, and fast scan landscape) were compared to CORs [i.e., conventional lateral (LC) and posteroanterior (PA) cephalograms and digital panoramic radiograph (OPG)]. Results The following radiation levels were measured: 131.7, 91, and 77 mu Sv in the portrait, normal landscape, and fast landscape modes, respectively. The overall effective dose for a COR was 35.81 mu Sv (PA: 8.90 mu Sv; OPG: 21.87 mu Sv; LC: 5.03 mu Sv). Disucssion Although one CBCT scan may replace all CORs, one set of CORs still entails 2-4 times less radiation than one CBCT. Depending on the scan mode, the radiation dose of a CBCT is about 3-6 times an OPG, 8-14 times a PA, and 15-26 times a lateral LC. Finally, in order to fully reconstruct cephalograms including the cranial base and other important structures, the CBCT portrait mode must be chosen, rendering the difference in radiation exposure even clearer (131.7 vs. 35.81 mu Sv). Shielding radiation-sensitive organs can reduce the effective dose considerably. Conclsion CBCT should not be recommended for use in all orthodontic patients as a substitute for a conventional set of radiographs. In CBCT, reducing the height of the field of view and shielding the thyroid are advisable methods and must be implemented to lower the exposure dose.