4.7 Article

A population state evaluation-based improvement framework for differential evolution

期刊

INFORMATION SCIENCES
卷 629, 期 -, 页码 15-38

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2023.01.120

关键词

Differential evolution; Population stagnation; Premature convergence; Improvement framework; Numerical optimization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes an improvement framework based on population state evaluation that can be embedded into different DE variants and population-based metaheuristic algorithms to address premature convergence and stagnation. The framework includes two population state evaluation mechanisms and two intervention operations, which significantly improve the optimization performance of existing algorithms.
Differential evolution (DE) is one of the most efficient evolutionary algorithms for solving numerical optimization problems; however, it still suffers from premature convergence and stagnation. To address these problems, we propose a population state evaluation (PSE)-based improvement framework that can be freely embedded into various existing DE variants and population-based metaheuristic algorithms. The PSE framework comprises two population state evaluation mechanisms: one for tracking the optimization state of the population during evolution and the other for evaluating the distribution state of individuals in the population to identify the specific problem (premature convergence or stagnation) encountered by the corresponding algorithm. In addition, we design two intervention operations (dispersion and aggregation) to address premature convergence and stagnation. To verify the effectiveness of the PSE framework, we conduct comparison experiments using nine algorithms (including two basic DE algorithms, six state-of-the-art DE variants, and one non-DE algorithm) to optimize four real-world problems and 59 test functions from the IEEE CEC 2014 and IEEE CEC 2017 testbeds. The experimental results show that the PSE framework can significantly improve the optimization performance of the existing algorithms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据