4.7 Article

FusionFedBlock: Fusion of blockchain and federated learning to preserve privacy in industry 5.0 br

期刊

INFORMATION FUSION
卷 90, 期 -, 页码 233-240

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.inffus.2022.09.027

关键词

Blockchain; Federated learning; Information fusion; Privacy -preservation; Industrial IoT; Industry 5; 0; Security

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article proposes a scheme called FusionFedBlock to address privacy issues in Industry 5.0 by combining blockchain and federated learning. In the scheme, industry departments can perform local learning updates and communicate with a global model, with validation conducted through a blockchain network. The scheme demonstrates excellent performance in privacy preservation and accuracy improvement.
Nowadays, Industries are experiencing rapid changes in the digital environment, referred to as Industry 5.0. The Internet of Things (IoT) and advanced technologies are essential in the industrial environment. Technological advancements can collect, transfer, and analyze vast amounts of data in the industry via promising technologies. Still, IoT has various issues when applied to industrial infrastructures, such as centralization, privacy preservation, latency, and security. This article proposes a scheme as FusionFedBlock: Fusion of Blockchain and Federated Learning to Preserve Privacy in Industry 5.0 to address the aforementioned issues. At the federated layer, the industry's departments (Production, Quality Control, Distribution) allow local learning updates with network automation and communicate to the global model, which miners verify in the Blockchain networks. Federated-Learning offers privacy preservation between various mentioned departments in industries. Decentralized secure storage is provided by the Distributed Hash Table (DHT) at the cloud layer. The validation outcomes of the proposed scheme demonstrate excellent performance as the accuracy of 93.5% in a 50% active node for Industry 5.0 compared to existing frameworks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据