期刊
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
卷 61, 期 49, 页码 18017-18029出版社
AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.2c02721
关键词
-
资金
- Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), Govt. of India [CRG/2018/004892]
This study evaluates the performance of two noniterative methods, monotonicity and factorization algorithms, in estimating air-core diameters in hydrocyclones. The results show that these two methods perform similarly on the experimental data and are faster than GN and TV methods.
Air-core dynamics during the hydrocyclone operation play an essential role in determining the separation efficiency. Precise monitoring of air-core dynamics during operation can suggest possible strategies to prevent underflow discharge problems. Electrical resistance tomography (ERT) facilitates online analysis of the internal behavior of air-core, because of its high temporal resolution. Existing results for ERT-based air-core reconstructions in hydrocyclones employ general algorithms that do not utilize process knowledge. In this paper, two noniterative methods, viz., monotonicity and factorization algorithms, which are process-aware, are evaluated to estimate air-core diameters in hydrocyclone under feed pressure variations. To further investigate the performance of these algorithms, comparison studies are made with Gauss-Newton (GN) and Total Variation (TV) algorithms. Initially, the algorithms are compared on simulated phantoms for qualitative analysis and to select hyper-parameters. A threshold method is developed for quantitative analysis of experimental data to obtain a crisp radius value. The ground truth is calculated from image processing on images obtained from a video camera. It is observed that GN, monotonicity, and factorization methods result in a similar performance on the experimental data. However, for very fine meshes, monotonicity and factorization algorithms are much faster than GN and TV methods.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据