4.6 Article

Effect of experimental exposures to 3-D printer emissions on nasal allergen responses and lung diffusing capacity for inhaled carbon monoxide/nitric oxide in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis

期刊

INDOOR AIR
卷 32, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ina.13174

关键词

3-D printer emissions; allergic rhinitis; diffusing capacity of the lung; exposures study; nanoparticles; nasal allergen response

资金

  1. FoFoLe program of the Medical Faculty of the Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU) [1058/1041]
  2. Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat Munchen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that emissions from 3-D printers made of different materials had similar effects on patients with allergic rhinitis, causing slight impacts on lung diffusing capacity. Concentrations of certain inflammatory factors slightly decreased after exposure to ABS emissions, while slightly increased after exposure to PLA emissions.
3-D printers are widely used. Based on previous findings, we hypothesized that their emissions could enhance allergen responsiveness and reduce lung diffusing capacity. Using a cross-over design, 28 young subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis were exposed to 3-D printer emissions, either from polylactic acid (PLA) or from acrylonitrile butadiene styrene copolymer (ABS), for 2 h each. Ninety minutes later, nasal allergen challenges were performed, with secretions sampled after 1.5 h. Besides nasal functional and inflammatory responses, assessments included diffusing capacity. There was also an inclusion day without exposure. The exposures elicited slight reductions in lung diffusing capacity for inhaled nitric oxide (DLNO) that were similar for PLA and ABS. Rhinomanometry showed the same allergen responses after both exposures. In nasal secretions, concentrations of interleukin 6 and tumor necrosis factor were slightly reduced after ABS exposure versus inclusion day, while that of interleukin 5 was slightly increased after PLA exposure versus inclusion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据