4.5 Article

A combination of novel hybrid deep learning model and quantile regression for short-term deterministic and probabilistic PV maximum power forecasting

期刊

IET RENEWABLE POWER GENERATION
卷 17, 期 4, 页码 794-813

出版社

INST ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY-IET
DOI: 10.1049/rpg2.12634

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article introduces a novel hybrid deep learning model named EDSACL for short-term PV maximum power prediction and validates its accuracy on two real-world datasets. The results demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed model compared to other predictive models.
Recently, the increasing penetration of renewable energy resources in power system, especially photovoltaic (PV) systems, has caused severe technical issues due to its randomness and dependency on primary sources. Therefore, precise output power forecast is vital for both system operators and PV system owners to improve grid stability and generation quality, respectively. This article proposes a novel hybrid deep learning model named EDSACL comprising four components, namely, convolutional neural network (CNN), long short-term memory (LSTM), self-attention mechanism (SAm), and residual learning (RL) strategy for short-term PV maximum power prediction with forecast horizon of 1, 2, and 4 h. This proposed model initially extracts spatial-temporal features of input data based on CNN and LSTM before using SAm to achieve hidden features of LSTM layers. RL strategy is employed to maintain the information flow entering the network. Besides, interval prediction is also implemented based on a combination of the EDSACL model and quantile regression with different probabilities. The forecast accuracy of the proposed model is validated based on two real-world data sets. The predicted results show the superiority of the proposed model over numerous predictive models; in particular, mean absolute percentage error values of the proposed hybrid model are under 6% in all case studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据