4.7 Article

Performance Analysis of RIS-Assisted Wireless Communications With Energy Harvesting

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY
卷 72, 期 1, 页码 1325-1330

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2022.3205448

关键词

Wireless communication; Energy harvesting; Probability density function; Power system reliability; Signal to noise ratio; Closed-form solutions; Upper bound; outage probability; reconfigurable intelligent surface; stochastic geometry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a RIS-assisted wireless communication system with energy harvesting is investigated. The power control of the base station and the random deployment of energy users are considered in the single information user scenario. Statistical features of the channel gains over the BS-RIS-IU and BS-RIS-EU cascaded links are characterized, and closed-form expressions for the information outage probability (IOP) of the IU and the upper bound for the energy outage probability (EOP) of EUs are derived. The analysis is further extended to include imperfect phase alignment and multiple IUs, and the correctness of the results is verified by Monte-Carlo simulation.
In this paper, we investigate a reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS)-assisted wireless communication system with energy harvesting. In the single information user (IU) scenario, we consider the power control of base station (BS) and the random deployment of energy users (EUs). To this end, we first characterize the statistical features of the channel gains over BS-RIS-IU and BS-RIS-EU cascaded links. Then, we derive a closed-form expression of the information outage probability (IOP) of the IU and show an upper bound of the energy outage probability (EOP) of EUs by invoking the Jensen's inequality. Furthermore, we consider two more general extensions, namely, the existence of imperfect phase alignment and multiple IUs. Finally, the correctness of the analysis results is verified by Monte-Carlo simulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据