4.7 Article

Data Distribution-Aware Online Client Selection Algorithm for Federated Learning in Heterogeneous Networks

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY
卷 72, 期 1, 页码 1127-1136

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2022.3205307

关键词

Servers; Convergence; Training; Optimization; Wireless networks; Clustering algorithms; Data models; Client selection; federated learning; multi-armed bandit problem; optimization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Federated learning (FL) is an alternative to traditional cloud-centric machine learning (ML) that has gained attention. The performance of FL is affected by the selection of clients with non-independent and identically distributed (non-IID) data. To minimize convergence time and improve learning accuracy, an optimization problem is formulated and a data distribution-aware online client selection (DOCS) algorithm is proposed.
Federated learning (FL) has received significant at-tention as a practical alternative to traditional cloud-centric ma-chine learning (ML). The performance (e.g., accuracy and conver-gence time) of FL is hampered by the selection of clients having non-independent and identically distributed (non-IID) data. In addition, a long convergence time is inevitable if clients with poor computation or communication capabilities participate in the FL procedure (i.e., the straggler problem). To minimize convergence time while guaranteeing high learning accuracy, we first formulate an optimization problem on client selection. As a practical solution, we devise a data distribution-aware online client selection (DOCS) algorithm. In DOCS, the FL server finds several clusters having near IID data and then uses a multi-armed bandit (MAB) technique to select the cluster with the lowest convergence time. The evalu-ation results demonstrate that DOCS can reduce the convergence time by up to 10% similar to 41% and improve the learning accuracy by up to 4% similar to 13% compared to the traditional client selection schemes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据