4.7 Article

Synchrophasor Data Based Q-V Droop Control of Wind Farm Integrated Power Systems

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS
卷 38, 期 1, 页码 358-370

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2022.3163337

关键词

Droop; doubly-fed inducton generator; phasor measurement unit; reactive power; wind farms

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a synchrophasor data based Q-V droop (SQVD) control technique to address the reactive power allocation issues in wind farms integrated to the grid. It uses synchronized droop gain and distributed coordination among DFIGs to optimize the reactive power allocation. The SQVD method is found to be more effective than constant Q-V droop and variable Q-V droop control methods in different dynamic situations.
With increasing scalability of grid-integrated wind farms (WFs), reactive power ancillary service through Q-V droop control of doubly-fed inducton generators (DFIGs) is one of the prime interests of power system operators. However, variable and uncertain availability of wind-resource at the wind turbines creates challenge against allocating reactive power reserve at the WFs for maintaining voltage stability of the grid. This issue can be resolved through online coordination among the WFs. This paper proposes a synchrophasor data based Q-V droop (SQVD) control technique for the WFs integrated to the grid through different point of common couplings (PCCs) in the power system transmission network. The data from the phasor measurement units (PMUs) at the WF-connected PCCs are used to obtain synchronized Q-V droop gain for each WF. Further, distributed coordination among DFIGs within each WF is performed to allocate optimum reactive power share at the converters. The total reserve of each WF is employed by their synchronized droop, in improving voltage stability at both the local PCC and neighboring PCCs. Performance of SQVD is verified at 418-bus practical Indian power system, in different dynamic situations of the grid, and found to be more effective as compared to the constant Q-V droop and variable Q-V droop control methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据