4.8 Article

Hyperbolic Deep Neural Networks: A Survey

出版社

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2021.3136921

关键词

Mathematical models; Manifolds; Numerical models; Deep learning; Task analysis; Geometry; Computational modeling; Neural networks on Riemannian manifold; hyperbolic neural networks; Poincare model; Lorentz model

资金

  1. Academy of Finland [328115]
  2. Academy Professor Project EmotionAI [336116, 345122]
  3. Project MiGA [316765]
  4. Infotech Oulu
  5. Academy of Finland (AKA) [328115] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hyperbolic deep neural networks (HDNNs) have shown superior performance and better physical interpretability in hierarchical structured data, and have been widely applied in different scientific fields. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the neural components in HDNN, demonstrating the potential of extending leading deep approaches to hyperbolic space and applications in various tasks.
Recently, hyperbolic deep neural networks (HDNNs) have been gaining momentum as the deep representations in the hyperbolic space provide high fidelity embeddings with few dimensions, especially for data possessing hierarchical structure. Such a hyperbolic neural architecture is quickly extended to different scientific fields, including natural language processing, single-cell RNA-sequence analysis, graph embedding, financial analysis, and computer vision. The promising results demonstrate its superior capability, significant compactness of the model, and a substantially better physical interpretability than its counterpart in the euclidean space. To stimulate future research, this paper presents a comprehensive review of the literature around the neural components in the construction of HDNN, as well as the generalization of the leading deep approaches to the hyperbolic space. It also presents current applications of various tasks, together with insightful observations and identifying open questions and promising future directions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据