4.7 Article

AESM2 Attribute-Based Encrypted Search for Multi-Owner and Multi-User Distributed Systems

出版社

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TPDS.2022.3216320

关键词

Searchable encryption; attribute-based encryption; access control; multi-owner distributed systems

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this article, we propose an attribute-based encrypted search scheme with ownership enhancement for multi-owner and multi-user distributed systems. Our design allows users to search data from authorized owners with only one trapdoor and enables fine-grained attribute level permission for data encryption. The evaluation shows that our scheme is effective and efficient.
With the rapid development of cloud computing, it is popular for data owners to outsource massive data to the cloud server for data sharing. To protect the privacy of sensitive data, many searchable encryption schemes are proposed. However, most of the existing studies focus on the single-owner model. In practice, users need to query data from distributed owners one by one, which inevitably brings great communication and computation overheads. Moreover, it lacks a secure scheme that realizes the access control requirements of individual owners. In this article, we propose AESM(2), a new attribute-based encrypted search with ownership enhancement scheme for multi-owner and multi-user distributed systems. Our design enables users to search data from authorized owners with only one trapdoor. Owners can enforce owner level permission on users and encrypt their data individually with fine-grained attribute level permission. For practical consideration, we further devise an efficient revocation method of the owner level permission for users, where ciphertexts do not need to be updated. We formally define and prove the security of our design. Moreover, we implement a system prototype and analyze the performance from theoretical and experimental aspects. The evaluation results demonstrate that our scheme is effective and efficient.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据